Just been looking at the Cash Gordon website and decided it’s not very good. Thought I’d share that with you all.
The site appears to be down now. Whether that’s on purpose by the sysadmin team in the data centre, or because of a DDoS I don’t know. I guess it won’t be coming back up in its original form though.
I am predicting that in the next year or two there will be a winner of a Pulitzer prize based on their Twitter updates. After doing somereal research I have decided that the award given will probably be in the journalism section, using the following criterion:
“For a distinguished example of local reporting of breaking news, with special emphasis on the speed and accuracy of initial coverage, presented in print or online or both” from the PDF linked to above.
It’s pretty much got to happen, right? That whole criterion sounds like it was written specifically for Twitter.
I was getting bored of finding that several people I know (mostly you, 0lly ) only bother tweeting if they stand a tiny little chance of winning a MacBook or whatever by sticking #moonfruit everywhere.
I decided to write a little command chain to show me how many of the most recent 200 tweets in my “friends timeline” contained the ubiquitous hashtag.
Turned out to be 9.5% of tweets. That’s damn near to 1 in 10 tweets being of absolutely no interest to me. Booooring! Here’s the command chain I wrote. I’m sure it can be refined plenty. I only use the XML API interface for Twitter because the JSON format doesn’t bother splitting results onto separate lines.
Obviously you’ll have to substitute YOUR_TWITTER_USERNAME for your actual username. You can also change the bit that says #moonfruit to anything else you want to search for. Oh yeah, this will prompt you for your Twitter password, but all communication is directly with Twitter, so you’ll be just about as safe as if you’d gone to the website. You’ll encounter a lot of problems if you try to run this in Windows, too.